Lesson 53
In the public interest
为了公众的利益
LRC
TXT
大字
小字
滚动
全页
1Lesson 53
2In the public interest
3What could not be reported in the official files?
4The Scandinavian countries are much admired all over the world for their enlightened social policies.
5Sweden has evolved an excellent system for protecting the individual citizen from high-handed or incompetent public officers.
6The system has worked so well, that it has been adopted in other countries too.
7The Swedes were the first to recognize that public officials like civil servants,
8police officers, health inspectors or tax-collectors can make mistakes
9or act over-zealously in the belief that they are serving the public.
10As long ago as 1809,
11the Swedish Parliament introduced a scheme to safeguard the interest of the individual.
12A parliamentary committee representing all political parties appoints a person
13who is suitably qualified to investigate private grievances against the State.
14The official title of the person is 'Justiteombudsman', but the Swedes commonly refer to him as the 'J.O.' or 'Ombudsman'.
15The Ombudsman is not subject to political pressure.
16He investigates complaints large and small that come to him from all levels of society.
17As complaints must be made in writing, the Ombudsman receives an average of 1, 200 letters a year.
18He has eight lawyer assistants to help him and he examines every single letter in detail.
19There is nothing secretive about the Ombudsman's work,
20for his correspondence is open to public inspection.
21If a citizen's complaint is justified the Ombudsman will act on his behalf.
22The action he takes varies according to the nature of the complaint.
23He may gently reprimand an official or even suggest to parliament that a law be altered.
24The following case is a typical example of the Ombudsman's work.
25A foreigner living in a Swedish village wrote to the Ombudsman complaining that he had been ill-treated by the police,
26simply because he was a foreigner.
27The Ombudsman immediately wrote to the Chief of Police in the district asking him to send a record of the case.
28There was nothing in the record to show that the foreigner's complaint was justified
29and the Chief of Police strongly denied the accusation.
30It was impossible for the Ombudsman to take action,
31but when he received a similar complaint from another foreigner in the same village,
32he immediately sent one of his lawyers to investigate the matter.
33The lawyer ascertained that a policeman had indeed dealt roughly with foreigners on several occasions.
34The fact that the policeman was prejudiced against foreigners could not be recorded in the official files.
35It was only possible for the Ombudsman to find this out by sending one of his representatives to check the facts.
36The policeman in question was severely reprimanded
37and was informed that if any further complaints were lodged against him, he would be prosecuted.
38The Ombudsman's prompt action at once put an end to an unpleasant practice which might have gone unnoticed.